jump to navigation

Alabama immigration laws spark church ire: The Church of England Newspaper, Aug 12, 2011 p 7. August 15, 2011

Posted by geoconger in Church of England Newspaper, Immigration.
Tags:
trackback

First published in The Church of England Newspaper.

Church leaders in Alabama have filed suit in a federal court in a bid to block the implementation of the state’s new immigration law.

On 1 August, the Episcopal Bishop of Alabama, the Rt Rev Henry N Parsley, Jr, along with the Roman Catholic Bishops of Mobile and Birmingham, and the Methodist Bishop of Northern Alabama asked the courts to throw out the new law. “The bishops have reason to fear that administering of religious sacraments, which are central to the Christian faith, to known undocumented persons may be criminalized under this law,” the lawsuit said.

The US Justice Department has also filed suit to block the implementation of the law, which is slated to go into effect on 1 September. “Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility that cannot be addressed through a patchwork of state immigration laws,” said US Attorney General Eric Holder in a press statement.

“To the extent we find state laws that interfere with the federal government’s enforcement of immigration law, we are prepared to bring suit, as we did in Arizona,” the attorney general said.

The Obama Administration’s policy of not enforcing rigorously American immigration laws has prompted a number of states to set their own immigration policies. The Alabama law forbids illegal aliens from residing in Alabama or holding employment in the state. It also forbids residents from providing shelter or services to illegal aliens and requires schools to report on the residency status of its students.

The bishops’ lawsuit stated that “if enforced, Alabama’s Anti-Immigration Law will make it a crime to follow God’s command to be Good Samaritans.”

It would place churches in the “untenable position of verifying individuals’ immigration documentation” before being able to provide things such as food, clothing, shelter and transportation to those in need,” the lawsuit said.

House Majority Leader Micky Hammon, a co-sponsor of the bill, told reporters, “I am disappointed that these church leaders would seek to shield those who, by their very presence, break our laws.”

“It is important to remember that the operative word in the phrase illegal immigrant is illegal,” Mr Hammon said.

A preliminary hearing on the suit has been set for 24 August before the Federal District Court for Northern Alabama.

Comments

1. Dave Francis - August 15, 2011

Like most industrialized nations, we can always find a special visa for top notch professionals, highly skilled occupations. Highly educated people are not a financial peril to our economy. Illegal aliens are, because they are feeding from tight budgets of states. The job magnet must be eliminated, the instant citizenship for babies smuggled past unsuspecting immigration agents at the borders or passenger lines at airports. The numbers are staggering and everybody who enters America should be tracked as the authorities do in Mexico? One of the major problems detected is that this administration and prior ones are still importing around a million foreign nations a year, with less than high occupational skills.

The TEA PARTY has become a huge pressure group of tens of millions of equally minded Americans from all ethnic and secular backgrounds, political parties, no matter what the unsympathetic activists conclude? The TEA PARTY members contribute to a focused viewpoint of limiting government, personal freedoms, personal responsibility, “fair” free international trade treaties and above all else consigning control to the States and the people. The TEA PARTY is about reforming all political parties and being in charge of the primary principles of our Constitution, once again retaining the foundation of which this sovereign nation has stood for 225 years.

There is a TEA PARTY membership just around the corner in every community, where you can join a local group.

In 2005, the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that up to 3 percent of the 30,000 persons called for jury duty from voter registration rolls, U.S. district court found were non citizens. Although this number may not seem like many, just 3 percent of registered voters would have been more than adequate to provide the winning presiden­tial vote margin in Florida in 2000. Florida is not unique. Thousands of non-citizens are registered to vote in different states and tens if not hundreds of thousands, may be a million in total may be at hand on the voter rolls countrywide. These numbers are significant? In municipal elections results are often determined by only a handful of votes, and even General elections have likely been compromised within the margin of the number of non-citizens–ille­gally registered to vote. Those who ignore the consequences of non-citizen registration, using fraudulent “Absentee Ballots” and voting either are deliberately blind to this severe problem or may essentially favor this form of illegal voting.

Election officials have a sworn duty not only to enforce those laws, but also to execute the registra­tion and election procedures that do not allow those laws to be bypassed or ignored. As the 2012 presidential election is perhaps is of historical significance, we as citizens must safeguard our foundation right, to ensure no non-citizens change the avenue towards the presidency through fraudulent means.

Rep. Michele Bachman is on the long, arduous road towards the potential presidency. That road is full of political land mines, because the hard leftists, lobbyists and radical open border organizations will do everything within its power to derail the ladies bid for the White House. Even now its assured they are digging for any kind of dirt, so they have some venomous flak to throw at her before 2012. You can already see the rancid seeders of the Liberal press, looking for anything significant that will demoralize Bachmann’s growing following. What they have no influence over is the millions attracted by her policies, as contemptuously shown when she refused to vote on the debt ceiling. She has already exposed issues others refuse to bring into debates, as one of her prime calls is for change in the corruption that swirls around Washington.

In regards to illegal Immigration there will be no compromise, as the TEA PARTY leaders will rigorously enforce the laws as set down in the 1986 Immigration Control & Reform Act. Amendments perhaps, but there will be no overturning this law, which has tough laws to sanction business owners who hire foreign labor. E-Verify will be mandated for every business nationwide, with the “Secure Communities” program to distinguish criminal aliens that will eventually be caught through fingerprint processing. There will be no waivers for Sanctuary cities laws, as those states will lose their federal funds. As I have been afraid to admit, a national ID card would be a ruthless deterrent, to close every loophole of illegal immigration. No non-counterfeit ID card—No Drivers License, No insurance, No Free Health Care, No Education and for certain NO welfare or public services. In other words No Nothing! In addition it will make the Mexican Consulates “Matricula Consular,” ID card for illegal aliens—OBSOLETE.

This document is supposedly an official identity card issued by the Mexican government, which it wanted to be officially recognized within the United States. Of course I doubt that even Michel Bachmann could enact this law, but think of all the billions of dollars saved, Trillions in the future. The TEA PARTY is no radical group, in fact its ordinary people like myself. I am certainly not a radical, but as a member of the Arizona Tea party, that has been costing this desert state nearly $3 Billion dollars a year in public assistance programs. When any citizen-oriented politician such as Arizona’s State Senator Russell Pierce, the dregs from the open border radicals appear from their holes and try to remove anybody who is trying to save their State from insolvency. Russell Pearce, a Republican, sponsored Arizona Senate Bill 1070 and now his supporters have formed their own petition group of Citizens Who Oppose the Pearce Recall.

No legal individual is turned away from the TEA PARTY membership of voters. The border barrier could remain uncompleted and 5000 troops would not have to be deployed. Currently FAIR reports annual projection up to this time is $113 billion dollars, which is paid out to cater to the illegal invaders, but it sure to go up under the Democratic and Republican policy decisions.

The Liberal wing of the democrats have a big say in what the Democratic party does, including their devious influence in blue states as California, Nevada, Washington State. FAIR has reported that 29 Billion is paid out to illegal aliens and the rest is forced on the States, Counties and cities to cover the $ 84 Billion. Financially California and Nevada are the hardest hit by the illegal incursions into the United States. An analysis shows that illegal aliens pay into federal and State covers roughly $13 Billion dollars a year and although as they are mostly low income, the majority of these dollars is returned in tax rebates. What defies logic they still manage to usher out of America around 46 Billion to foreign banks.

MY EARLIER BLOGS: http://brittanicus-enoughisenough.blogspot.com/

No Copyright. Distribute Freely.

For an exceptional commenting program, use DISQUS on your website.


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: