jump to navigation

Kenyan church says ‘no’ to new constitution: The Church of England Newspaper, May 7, 2010 p 8. May 14, 2010

Posted by geoconger in Anglican Church of Kenya, Church of England Newspaper.
trackback

Archbishop Eliud Wabukala

First published in The Church of England Newspaper.

The Anglican Church of Kenya (AKC) has rejected the country’s draft constitution, encouraging its members to vote against ratification in this summer’s nationwide referendum.

The AKC now joins the Catholic Church and the National Council of Churches of Kenya in opposing the revised constitution endorsed by Parliament and the Cabinet of President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga.

However, the Church will not take an active role in the coming political battle. Clergy and churchgoers may participate in the ‘no’ campaign as individuals, but as an institution, the Church will not fund nor take part in what is expected to be a contentious campaign.

On April 29 the Church’s House of Bishops released a statement following an all-day meeting at All Saints Cathedral in Nairobi. The bishops said the government’s decision to refuse to consider any amendments to the draft had forced the Church to act.

“We therefore say ‘no’ to the proposed constitution as it is unless amendments are effected before the referendum,” the bishops said in a statement read to the press by Archbishop Eliud Wabukala.

The Archbishop said the exemption for Muslims from the Bill of Rights, the institutionalization of Kadhi courts governed by Sharia law with the justice system, and the permissive stance on abortion was unacceptable to the Church.

Archbishop Wabukala urged government leaders to adopt a neutral position on the constitution. It was the view of the Kenyan bishops that the “President and the Prime Minister should not be taking sides for Yes or No but should be spearheading national healing and reconciliation,” he said.

The Archbishop added that the bishops were “appalled by the decision and declaration by the Cabinet that no amendments can and will be made prior to the referendum. The declarations are therefore in our opinion misplaced, unconstitutional and an attempt to dictate on the outcome of the referendum”.

After Parliament endorsed the draft constitution last month, the Catholic Church immediately came out against the bill. However, Archbishop Wabukala said the Anglican Church would hold off taking a formal position until after a church-wide consultation had been held to gauge the views of its members.

Last month the Archbishop stated he was inclined to support the draft, arguing that its offending provisions could be removed by amendments passed by Parliament. However, he stated this was his private view and not the view of the Church.

Former Archbishop David Gitari came out in favour of the draft, the Kenyan Broadcasting Corporation reported. “The draft constitution is democratic and guarantees justice, end of corruption and impunity therefore we cannot be neutral on this matter,” Dr Gitari said, and was better than the current post-independence constitution.

However, former Archbishop Benjamin Nzimbi urged rejection of the draft, saying as a matter of conscience he could not support the abortion and Kadhi court clauses. “There is need for truth to prevail in the country in this time when Kenyans are at crossroads over the constitutional dispensation,” he told the KBC, adding that Kenyans “needed to be fully educated on the constitution because it will affect their lives but they are now being influenced without hindsight of the contents.”

The head of the ACK’s advocacy group, Bishop Beneah Salala of Mumias, told the Sunday Nation that the Church would not fund the ‘no’ campaign. “As a bishop, I will never ask Christians to tithe and give their money to fund the No campaign. We don’t want to antagonise Kenyans,” he said.

In his sermon at All Saints Cathedral on May 2, Archbishop Wabukala said he feared the forthcoming campaign would be short on substance and long on emotion. It was a “difficult time” in the nation’s history, he said, but urged Kenyans to “use the next one month to read the document and pray.”

However, as a Christian, he had a duty to speak out against clauses in the draft that were contrary to Christian teaching, the archbishop said.

Comments

1. Dr Stephen Muketha - June 5, 2010

VOTE “NO”!
THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION LEGALISES ABORTION AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION
ARTICLE 26 (4) Abortion is not permitted unless in the OPINION of A TRAINED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL there is need for emergency treatment or the life or HEALTH of a mother is in danger or IF PERMITTED IN ANY OTHER WRITTEN LAW.
ARTICLE 43 (1) a Every person has a right to the highest attainable standard of health, which includes the right to health care services INCLUDING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE.
EXPLANATION:
1. OPINION-the dictionary defines it as A BELIEF OR CONCLUSION HELD WITH CONFIDENCE BUT NOT SUBSTANTIATED BY POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE, EVIDENCE, REASON OR PROOF. This is not the way to deal with our women and children
2. A trained HEALTH PROFESSIONAL can be a PUBLIC HEALTH TECHNICIAN, NURSE, CLINICAL OFFICER, PHYSIOTHERAPIST, DENTIST, PHARMACIST, SURGEON, DOCTOR ETC. These people specialize in different things. The law allows them to conduct abortions without consulting or explaining anything to anybody. This is lack orespect for our women
3. World Health Organisation defines HEALTH as a STATE OF MENTAL, PHYSICAL or SOCIAL WELL BEING and not merely absence of disease or infirmity. In the proposed constitution, abortion can be carried out for any reason real or imagined, including POVERTY which is a social component of health.
4. Any other WRITTEN LAW provides ROOM for legalization of abortion. One such law is already here, “The Proposed Reproductive Health and Rights Bill 2008”!
5. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICE includes ABORTION. Inclusion in the draft was to emphasis the place of abortion in the new Kenyan law.
Over 70% of Kenyans DO NOT WANT ABORTION LEGALISED IN KENYA.
DO NOT EXCHANGE THE PRECIOUS LIVES OF OUR WOMEN, GIRLS AND UNBORN CHILDREN WITH A DOCUMENT THAT CAN NEVER BE CHANGED

KADHI’S COURTS ARE RELIGIOUS COURTS
(2)A person shall not be qualified to be appointed to hold or act in the office of Kadhi unless the person PROFESSES THE MUSLIM RELIGION;
(5)No part of the former Protectorate shall be outside the jurisdiction of some Kadhi’s court.
(6)The jurisdiction of a Kadhi’s court shall extend to the determination of questions of MUSLIM LAW relating to personal status, marriage, divorce or inheritance in proceedings in which all the parties profess the Muslim religion.
EXPLANATION:
1. Muslim Law is SHARIAH LAW-think about NIGERIA, SOMALIA, SAUDI ARABIA etc
2. The ONLY religion recognized and mentioned in this constitution is ISLAM.
3. The ONLY religious members of the judiciary and therefore government are Muslims.
4. The ONLY qualification to be a Kadhi is to be a Muslim-a law degree is not necessary.
5. The ONLY religious courts that are recognized in this constitution are Kadhi’s courts. They are allowed by the draft constitution to operate anywhere.
6. The ONLY religious institutions that receive government funding are Kadhis courts to make decisions concerning Muslims only.

CONSIDER THIS; All previous versions of the Draft Constitution have consistently stated categorically that: “State and religion will be separate” and ”There will be no state religion” and “All religions will be treated equally”. These provisions HAVE NOW BEEN REMOVED, leaving only that There Will Be No State Religion. The removal of these phrases means ALL RELIGIONS ARE NOT EQUAL.
THE EVER PRESENT RISK: Because all religions are NOT EQUAL, Christianity and other religions including traditional African religions are not recognized and therefore not mentioned in the draft constitution. We shall soon find ourselves UNABLE TO ENJOY OUR FREEDOM OF WORSHIP under an ISLAMIC GOVERNMENT-THAT ONLY RECOGNISES WHAT IS IN THE CONSTITUTION.
THAT IS WHY THE DRAFT SHOULD NOT MENTION ISLAM OR THE KADHI’S!
DO NOT EXCHANGE OUR PRECIOUS NATION WITH A DOCUMENT THAT CAN NEVER BE CHANGED
RAILA AND KIBAKI WILL NEVER HELP US WHEN TROUBLE COMES
Remember to pray, register as a voter and educate others to VOTE ‘NO’
Christian Professionals for NO TO DRAFT KATIBA
http://www.kenyachristianchurchforum.org/

2. Dr P Gichure - June 6, 2010

I am saying NO because my christian conscience is clear. I agree entirely with Dr Stephen.

My proposal is that we tell Kenyans that there is no hurry. We should set our minds in having many referendums when we have issues like this. We should have referendums every two years so that the Government do not commit us to international conditionalities which will make our lives difficult.

3. Dr Muketha - June 7, 2010

THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION LEGALISES ABORTION AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION

ARTICLE 26 (4) Abortion is not permitted unless in the OPINION of A TRAINED
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL there is need for emergency treatment or the life or
HEALTH of a mother is in danger or IF PERMITTED IN ANY OTHER WRITTEN LAW.

ARTICLE 43 (1) a Every person has a right to the highest attainable standard
of health, which includes the right to health care services INCLUDING
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE.

EXPLANATION:

1. OPINION-the dictionary defines it as A BELIEF OR CONCLUSION HELD WITH
CONFIDENCE BUT NOT SUBSTANTIATED BY POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE, EVIDENCE, REASON OR
PROOF. This is not the way to deal with our women and children

2. A trained HEALTH PROFESSIONAL can be a PUBLIC HEALTH TECHNICIAN, NURSE,
CLINICAL OFFICER, PHYSIOTHERAPIST, DENTIST, PHARMACIST, SURGEON,
PSYCHIATRIST OR ANY FORM OF DOCTOR ETC. These people specialize in different
things many not related to reproductive health. The draft constitution
allows such people to conduct abortions without consulting or explaining
anything to anybody even colleagues. This puts our women, girls and children
at serious risk of injury and death.

3. World Health Organisation defines HEALTH as a STATE OF MENTAL, PHYSICAL
or SOCIAL WELL BEING and not merely absence of disease or infirmity. In the
proposed constitution, abortion can be carried out for any reason real or
imagined, including POVERTY which is a social component of health.

4. Any other WRITTEN LAW provides ROOM for legalization of abortion. One
such law is already here, “The Proposed Reproductive Health and Rights Bill
2008″!

5. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICE includes ABORTION. Inclusion of this
phrase in the draft was to emphasis the place of abortion in the new Kenyan
constitution.

6. By not subjecting international treaties, accords etc to the Kenyan
Constitution, we allow without any restriction, foreign laws that encourage
and support abortion to be be applied in Kenya. This is back door
legalization of abortion

Over 70% of Kenyans DO
NOT WANT ABORTION LEGALIZED IN KENYA.

DO NOT EXCHANGE THE PRECIOUS LIVES OF OUR WOMEN, GIRLS AND UNBORN CHILDREN
WITH A DOCUMENT THAT CAN NEVER BE CHANGED

KADHI’S COURTS ARE RELIGIOUS COURTS

THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION SAYS THAT:

(2)A person shall not be qualified to be appointed to hold or act in the
office of Kadhi unless the person PROFESSES THE MUSLIM RELIGION;

(5)No part of the former Protectorate shall be outside the jurisdiction of
some Kadhi’s court.

(6)The jurisdiction of a Kadhi’s court shall extend to the determination of
questions of MUSLIM LAW relating to personal status, marriage, divorce or
inheritance in proceedings in which all the parties profess the Muslim
religion.

EXPLANATION:

1. Muslim Law is SHARIAH LAW-think about what goes on in NIGERIA,
SOMALIA, SAUDI ARABIA, AFGHANISTAN etc

2. The ONLY religion recognized and mentioned in this constitution is
ISLAM.

3. The ONLY religious members of the judiciary and therefore government
are Muslims.

4. The ONLY qualification to be a Kadhi is to be a Muslim-a law degree
is not necessary.

5. The ONLY religious courts that are recognized in this constitution
are Kadhi’s courts. They are allowed by the draft constitution to operate
anywhere.

6. The ONLY religious institutions that receive government funding are
Kadhi’s courts to make decisions concerning Muslims only.

CONSIDER THIS; All previous versions of the Draft Constitution have
consistently stated categorically that: “State and religion will be
separate” and “There will be no state religion” and “All religions will be
treated equally”. These provisions HAVE NOW BEEN REMOVED, leaving only that
There Will Be No State Religion. The removal of these phrases means ALL
RELIGIONS ARE NOT EQUAL. By being silent on the separation of state and
religion, It means that “state and religion” will soon be one and the same
thing.

THE EVER PRESENT RISK: Because all religions are NOT EQUAL, Christianity and
other religions including traditional African religions are not recognized
and therefore not mentioned in the draft constitution. We shall soon find
ourselves UNABLE TO ENJOY OUR FREEDOM OF WORSHIP under an ISLAMIC
GOVERNMENT-THAT ONLY RECOGNISES WHAT IS IN THE CONSTITUTION.

THAT IS WHY THE DRAFT SHOULD NOT MENTION ISLAM OR THE KADHI’S!

DEAR FRIEND, DO NOT RUSH TO EXCHANGE YOUR PRECIOUS NATION WITH A DOCUMENT
THAT CAN NEVER BE CHANGED

RAILA AND KIBAKI WILL NEVER HELP US WHEN TROUBLE COMES

Remember to pray, register as a voter and educate others to VOTE ‘NO’ DR STEPHEN MUKETHA
http://www.kenyachristianchurchforum.org/


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,788 other followers